Undoing Commits & Changes
In this section, we will discuss the available 'undo' Git strategies and commands. It is first important to note that Git does not have a traditional 'undo' system like those found in a word processing application. It will be beneficial to refrain from mapping Git operations to any traditional 'undo' mental model. Additionally, Git has its own nomenclature for 'undo' operations that it is best to leverage in a discussion. This nomenclature includes terms like reset, revert, checkout, clean, and more.
A fun metaphor is to think of Git as a timeline management utility. Commits are snapshots of a point in time or points of interest along the timeline of a project's history. Additionally, multiple timelines can be managed through the use of branches. When 'undoing' in Git, you are usually moving back in time, or to another timeline where mistakes didn't happen.
This tutorial provides all of the necessary skills to work with previous revisions of a software project. First, it shows you how to explore old commits, then it explains the difference between reverting public commits in the project history vs. resetting unpublished changes on your local machine.
Finding what is lost: Reviewing old commits
The whole idea behind any version control system is to store “safe” copies of a project so that you never have to worry about irreparably breaking your code base. Once you’ve built up a project history of commits, you can review and revisit any commit in the history. One of the best utilities for reviewing the history of a Git repository is the
git log command. In the example below, we use
git log to get a list of the latest commits to a popular open-source graphics library.
git log --oneline e2f9a78fe Replaced FlyControls with OrbitControls d35ce0178 Editor: Shortcuts panel Safari support. 9dbe8d0cf Editor: Sidebar.Controls to Sidebar.Settings.Shortcuts. Clean up. 05c5288fc Merge pull request #12612 from TyLindberg/editor-controls-panel 0d8b6e74b Merge pull request #12805 from harto/patch-1 23b20c22e Merge pull request #12801 from gam0022/improve-raymarching-example-v2 fe78029f1 Fix typo in documentation 7ce43c448 Merge pull request #12794 from WestLangley/dev-x 17452bb93 Merge pull request #12778 from OndrejSpanel/unitTestFixes b5c1b5c70 Merge pull request #12799 from dhritzkiv/patch-21 1b48ff4d2 Updated builds. 88adbcdf6 WebVRManager: Clean up. 2720fbb08 Merge pull request #12803 from dmarcos/parentPoseObject 9ed629301 Check parent of poseObject instead of camera 219f3eb13 Update GLTFLoader.js 15f13bb3c Update GLTFLoader.js 6d9c22a3b Update uniforms only when onWindowResize 881b25b58 Update ProjectionMatrix on change aspect
Each commit has a unique SHA-1 identifying hash. These IDs are used to travel through the committed timeline and revisit commits. By default,
git log will only show commits for the currently selected branch. It is entirely possible that the commit you're looking for is on another branch. You can view all commits across all branches by executing
git log --branches=*. The command
git branch is used to view and visit other branches. Invoking the command,
git branch -a will return a list of all known branch names. One of these branch names can then be logged using
git log .
When you have found a commit reference to the point in history you want to visit, you can utilize the
git checkout command to visit that commit.
Git checkout is an easy way to “load” any of these saved snapshots onto your development machine. During the normal course of development, the
HEAD usually points to
master or some other local branch, but when you check out a previous commit,
HEAD no longer points to a branch—it points directly to a commit. This is called a “detached
HEAD” state, and it can be visualized as the following:
Checking out an old file does not move the
HEAD pointer. It remains on the same branch and same commit, avoiding a 'detached head' state. You can then commit the old version of the file in a new snapshot as you would any other changes. So, in effect, this usage of
git checkout on a file, serves as a way to revert back to an old version of an individual file. For more information on these two modes visit the
git checkout page
Viewing an old revision
This example assumes that you’ve started developing a crazy experiment, but you’re not sure if you want to keep it or not. To help you decide, you want to take a look at the state of the project before you started your experiment. First, you’ll need to find the ID of the revision you want to see.
git log --oneline
Let’s say your project history looks something like the following:
b7119f2 Continue doing crazy things 872fa7e Try something crazy a1e8fb5 Make some important changes to hello.txt 435b61d Create hello.txt 9773e52 Initial import
Undoing a committed snapshot
There are technically several different strategies to 'undo' a commit. The following examples will assume we have a commit history that looks like:
git log --oneline 872fa7e Try something crazy a1e8fb5 Make some important changes to hello.txt 435b61d Create hello.txt 9773e52 Initial import
We will focus on undoing the
872fa7e Try something crazy commit. Maybe things got a little too crazy.
How to undo a commit with git checkout
git checkout command we can checkout the previous commit,
a1e8fb5, putting the repository in a state before the crazy commit happened. Checking out a specific commit will put the repo in a "detached HEAD" state. This means you are no longer working on any branch. In a detached state, any new commits you make will be orphaned when you change branches back to an established branch. Orphaned commits are up for deletion by Git's garbage collector. The garbage collector runs on a configured interval and permanently destroys orphaned commits. To prevent orphaned commits from being garbage collected, we need to ensure we are on a branch.
From the detached HEAD state, we can execute
git checkout -b new_branch_without_crazy_commit. This will create a new branch named
new_branch_without_crazy_commit and switch to that state. The repo is now on a new history timeline in which the
872fa7e commit no longer exists. At this point, we can continue work on this new branch in which the
872fa7e commit no longer exists and consider it 'undone'. Unfortunately, if you need the previous branch, maybe it was your
master branch, this undo strategy is not appropriate. Let's look at some other 'undo' strategies. For more information and examples review our in-depth
git checkout discussion.
How to undo a public commit with git revert
Let's assume we are back to our original commit history example. The history that includes the
872fa7e commit. This time let's try a revert 'undo'. If we execute
git revert HEAD, Git will create a new commit with the inverse of the last commit. This adds a new commit to the current branch history and now makes it look like:
git log --oneline e2f9a78 Revert "Try something crazy" 872fa7e Try something crazy a1e8fb5 Make some important changes to hello.txt 435b61d Create hello.txt 9773e52 Initial import
At this point, we have again technically 'undone' the
872fa7e commit. Although
872fa7e still exists in the history, the new
e2f9a78 commit is an inverse of the changes in
872fa7e. Unlike our previous checkout strategy, we can continue using the same branch. This solution is a satisfactory undo. This is the ideal 'undo' method for working with public shared repositories. If you have requirements of keeping a curated and minimal Git history this strategy may not be satisfactory.
How to undo a commit with git reset
Undoing the last commit
In the previous section, we discussed different strategies for undoing commits. These strategies are all applicable to the most recent commit as well. In some cases though, you might not need to remove or reset the last commit. Maybe it was just made prematurely. In this case you can amend the most recent commit. Once you have made more changes in the working directory and staged them for commit by using
git add, you can execute
git commit --amend. This will have Git open the configured system editor and let you modify the last commit message. The new changes will be added to the amended commit.
Undoing uncommitted changes
Before changes are committed to the repository history, they live in the staging index and the working directory. You may need to undo changes within these two areas. The staging index and working directory are internal Git state management mechanisms. For more detailed information on how these two mechanisms operate, visit the
git reset page which explores them in depth.
The working directory
The working directory is generally in sync with the local file system. To undo changes in the working directory you can edit files like you normally would using your favorite editor. Git has a couple utilities that help manage the working directory. There is the
git clean command which is a convenience utility for undoing changes to the working directory. Additionally,
git reset can be invoked with the
--hard options and will apply a reset to the working directory.
The staging index
git add command is used to add changes to the staging index.
Git reset is primarily used to undo the staging index changes. A
--mixed reset will move any pending changes from the staging index back into the working directory.
Undoing public changes
When working on a team with remote repositories, extra consideration needs to be made when undoing changes.
Git reset should generally be considered a 'local' undo method. A reset should be used when undoing changes to a private branch. This safely isolates the removal of commits from other branches that may be in use by other developers. Problems arise when a reset is executed on a shared branch and that branch is then pushed remotely with
git push. Git will block the push in this scenario complaining that the branch being pushed is out of date from the remote branch as it is missing commits.
The preferred method of undoing shared history is
git revert. A revert is safer than a reset because it will not remove any commits from a shared history. A revert will retain the commits you want to undo and create a new commit that inverts the undesired commit. This method is safer for shared remote collaboration because a remote developer can then pull the branch and receive the new revert commit which undoes the undesired commit.