The second challenge to social media/enterprise 2.0 adoption that Sandy Kemsley cites has to do with the names of these tools, and the notion that we:

…feel a bit silly stating that we blog (as opposed to maintaining a reverse chronological online journal), or use a wiki (as opposed to a collaborative editing workspace). Seriously now, “blog”? “Wiki”? “Mashup”? Do we really expect stuffy enterprise executives to get past the names and see how the technology can impact their organization?

I don’t think the names are all that silly. There’s nothing exciting about “reverse chronological online journal” and in fact it sounds like something that a committee of stuffy people came up with.
Unique names provide an opening to ask “What is it?”. If I heard “collaborative editing workspace” that’s too generic for me to know it’s a new kind of tool, but if I heard “wiki” I’d ask, “What’s that?” There’s the opening for someone to explain it.

Fresh ideas, announcements, and inspiration for your team, delivered weekly.

Subscribe now

Fresh ideas, announcements, and inspiration for your team, delivered weekly.

Subscribe now